Lloyds Banking Group Profits Double Amid New Tax Hike
Chancellor's corporation tax surcharge increase aims to fund energy bill support, drawing criticism from bank executives.

Carla Rooney
Lloyds Banking Group reported a pre-tax profit of £2.3 billion for its third quarter.
This figure nearly doubles the £1.2 billion recorded during the same period a year ago, showcasing a significant financial upturn for the banking giant.
The profit surge comes as Chancellor John Healey announced a planned doubling of the bank’s corporation tax surcharge, increasing it from 3% to 6%. This measure is set to take effect from January and will remain in place for 15 months.
The Treasury expects the tax hike to generate £1.5 billion over its 15-month duration. Chancellor Healey claims the additional funds will help support household energy bills, stating, "I was asking a bit more of our banks to support ordinary people."
I was asking a bit more of our banks to support ordinary people.
William Chalmers, Lloyds Banking Group's chief financial officer, criticised the chancellor for linking bank tax increases to energy bill support. Chalmers stated that "Additional taxes are unhelpful to achieving both of those objectives: UK growth or international competitiveness."
Chalmers also claimed that the planned doubling of the surcharge is unhelpful for achieving UK economic growth and that there is no obvious linkage between energy prices and bank taxes. He further asserted, "In fact, if anything, it makes it even more important that we’re able to lend into the real economy and secure growth, which is the best defence against energy price impact that might otherwise prevail in the UK economy."
Lloyds has provided over £1.25 billion in lending to more than 50,000 first-time buyers this year, demonstrating its role in the broader economy. Despite the chancellor's assurance that the measure is temporary, senior bankers and industry lobbyists have raised concerns.
These industry figures claim that linking bank taxes to soaring energy costs could open the door to an extension or further rise in the levy after the initial 15 months expire. Chalmers remarked, "We take it for what it is, but we do sincerely hope that it is indeed limited."