Freemasons Challenge Met Police Reporting Policy

The UGLE claims this reporting requirement undermines public credibility and breaches human rights and GDPR rules.

Mr Justice Chamberlain stated that a judge will decide on the injunction this week without a hearing.

The judge also noted the force's agreement to consider withdrawing the challenged decision, following representations from the Order of Women Freemasons and the Honourable Fraternity of Ancient Freemasons.

The Met previously stated it would 'robustly defend' the challenge, but has since agreed to reconsider the policy.

The Met's decision followed a survey where two-thirds of respondents felt membership affects perceptions of police impartiality and public trust.

However, the UGLE claims less than 5 percent of officers and staff completed this survey, casting doubt on its validity.

Bodies representing Freemasons in England, Wales, the Isle of Man, and the Channel Islands claim the move is discriminatory and could have far-reaching consequences.

The UGLE argues the policy is unfair and could lead to discrimination against members who are already subject to strict vetting procedures.

The UGLE maintains that the reporting requirement damages the public standing of Freemasons and is seeking a full judicial review of the policy.

The Met has cited concerns over police impartiality and public trust as the basis for its new policy, but the UGLE disputes this rationale.

The UGLE's injunction bid is part of a broader effort to protect the rights of Freemasons and ensure they are not unfairly targeted by the policy.